Introduction: The Invisible Epidemic Costing Our City Billions

For a graphic designer in Brooklyn, it starts as a dull ache in the lower back after a long day hunched over a project. For a construction worker in Queens, it’s a searing shoulder pain that makes lifting a chore. For a nurse in the Bronx, it’s the persistent throb in their feet at the end of a 12-hour shift. In a city that never sleeps, millions of New Yorkers are powered by a workforce that is quietly, relentlessly, in pain. This isn’t just a personal struggle; it’s a silent public health crisis with a staggering economic footprint. In New York City, where the cost of living is among the highest in the nation and housing costs have soared over 68% in the last decade, the inability to work at full capacity is not merely an inconvenience—it’s a direct threat to financial stability.¹˒²

Chronic pain has become one of the most pervasive and costly health issues in the United States, but its impact is uniquely amplified in the high-stakes environment of New York City. The economic burden is immense, estimated to cost the nation up to $635 billion annually—more than the costs of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined.³⁻⁵ This report will dissect this enormous cost, revealing how chronic pain directly impacts NYC’s workforce through lost work hours, diminished productivity, and the subsequent financial fallout for both individuals and employers. It will then explore a path forward, presenting evidence-based, cost-effective interventions—specifically acupuncture and dry needling—as a viable strategy to mitigate these costs and foster a healthier, more productive, and more resilient New York.

The Nature of Chronic Pain and Its Widespread Impact

To grasp the economic consequences of chronic pain, it is essential to first understand the condition itself. It is far more than just a lingering ache; it is a complex medical issue that fundamentally alters a person’s health and quality of life.⁶

Differentiating Acute vs. Chronic Pain

Pain is the body’s alarm system. When you sprain an ankle or touch a hot stove, your nervous system sends a signal of acute pain, warning you of injury. This pain is a temporary, protective response that subsides once the underlying cause is treated or healed.⁷ Chronic pain, however, is different. It is formally defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as pain that persists or recurs for more than three months, lasting long after the initial injury or illness should have resolved.⁶˒⁸

A helpful way to think about it is to compare it to a fire alarm. Acute pain is the alarm sounding when there is a real fire; it serves a critical purpose. Chronic pain is like an alarm that continues to blare loudly even after the fire has been extinguished.⁷ With chronic pain, the nervous system continues firing pain signals for weeks, months, or even years, effectively rewiring itself into a state of high alert.⁹ This phenomenon, known as central sensitization, means the pain itself has become the disease, a malfunction of the body’s communication network.⁸˒¹⁰

The Systemic Effects of Chronic Pain on Health and Well-being

Because chronic pain is a disease of the nervous system, its effects ripple throughout the body and mind, creating a debilitating cycle. Individuals with chronic pain often experience a cascade of related symptoms and conditions, including:

• Persistent Fatigue: The constant drain of managing pain can lead to overwhelming exhaustion.⁶
• Sleep Disturbances: Pain makes it difficult to fall asleep and stay asleep, and poor sleep, in turn, can worsen pain perception.⁶˒¹¹
• Mental Health Challenges: There is a strong link between chronic pain and conditions like anxiety and depression. The relentless nature of the pain and its impact on daily life can take a severe emotional toll.¹¹˒¹²
• Physical Limitations: The pain can restrict mobility and make everyday activities, from household chores to exercise, incredibly difficult.¹³˒¹⁴

This condition manifests in many forms that are particularly relevant to a working population. Common types include persistent lower back pain, chronic neck pain, arthritis, fibromyalgia, and cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs)—injuries resulting from repetitive motions common in many jobs, from office work to manual labor.⁶˒⁹˒¹⁵ Understanding that chronic pain is a complex, systemic condition—not just a simple, prolonged symptom—is crucial for appreciating why it has such a profound impact on a person’s ability to function, work, and maintain their economic well-being.

Chronic Pain Prevalence: National and New York Statistics

The scale of the chronic pain epidemic is vast, affecting tens of millions of people across the country. Data from national and state-level sources paint a clear picture of a widespread issue that disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable populations, a trend that holds true for New York.

National Chronic Pain Data

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prevalence of chronic pain in the United States is staggering. In 2021, an estimated 51.6 million American adults—or 20.9% of the adult population—experienced chronic pain.⁴

Even more concerning is the subset of individuals suffering from “high-impact” chronic pain. This is defined as pain that limits life or work activities on most days or every day. In 2021, 17.1 million U.S. adults, or 6.9% of the population, fell into this category.⁴˒⁵ This group represents the epicenter of the productivity crisis, as their ability to work consistently and effectively is severely compromised.

Chronic Pain and Disability Rates in New York

The national trends are reflected and, in some ways, intensified in New York. While specific “chronic pain” prevalence data for the state is not as readily available, related statistics on chronic disease and disability reveal a similar, and deeply troubling, pattern. More than 40% of adults in New York State suffer from at least one chronic disease, and these conditions are the leading cause of disability statewide.¹⁶⁻¹⁸

Data from 2021 shows that approximately 3.9 million New York adults, or 26.6% of the population, report living with a disability. This figure is slightly higher in New York City, at 27.8%, compared to the rest of the state at 25.8%.¹⁹ The link between chronic conditions and disability is direct and powerful: over half (57.7%) of New York adults who have two or more chronic conditions also report having a disability, underscoring how these health issues translate into functional limitations.¹⁹

The Link Between Chronic Pain and Socioeconomic Status

Perhaps the most critical insight from the data is the undeniable link between chronic pain, disability, and economic status. This is not a condition that affects all populations equally. Nationally, adults living in poverty are significantly more likely to experience both chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain.⁵

This vicious cycle is starkly illustrated in New York State data. The prevalence of disability skyrockets among lower-income households. A staggering 57.8% of New York adults with an annual household income of less than $15,000 report living with a disability. In stark contrast, only 13.8% of adults earning $75,000 or more report a disability.¹⁹ This disparity reveals that chronic pain and its disabling effects are not just a health crisis but also a crisis of economic inequality, trapping many New Yorkers in a cycle of poor health and financial hardship.

Table 1: The Disproportionate Burden of Chronic Pain and Disability

The National Economic Burden of Chronic Pain

The human toll of chronic pain is immeasurable, but its economic cost is quantifiable—and the numbers are astronomical. It represents the single most expensive public health condition in the United States, creating a financial burden that far exceeds that of other well-known diseases.

Quantifying the Staggering National Cost

Nationally, the total annual economic cost of chronic pain is estimated to be between $560 billion and $635 billion.³⁻⁵˒²¹ To put this figure into perspective, it eclipses the annual costs associated with heart disease ($309 billion), cancer ($243 billion), and diabetes ($188 billion).³ This staggering sum underscores that addressing chronic pain is not only a moral and medical imperative but also an urgent economic one.

Direct vs. Indirect Costs: Healthcare Spending vs. Lost Productivity

The total cost of pain can be broken down into two main categories: direct costs and indirect costs. Understanding the distinction between them is critical to identifying the most effective solutions.

• Direct Costs: These are the expenses that are most visible and easiest to track. They include all spending on medical care, such as payments for doctor visits, hospital stays, prescription medications, and surgical procedures. The annual direct costs of pain in the U.S. are estimated to be between $261 billion and $300 billion.³
• Indirect Costs: This category represents the larger, though often hidden, portion of the economic burden. Indirect costs are primarily composed of lost productivity resulting from the impact of pain on the workforce. This includes absenteeism (days of work missed), presenteeism (reduced performance and efficiency while at work), lower wages, and early retirement. The annual indirect costs of pain are estimated to be between $299 billion and $335 billion.³˒²²

The data reveals a crucial point: the greatest economic damage from chronic pain is not what is spent in clinics and pharmacies, but what is lost in economic output from a weakened and less productive workforce. This insight fundamentally shifts the focus of the problem. Any solution aimed solely at reducing medical bills is addressing less than half of the issue. The most impactful and valuable interventions, therefore, will be those that restore a person’s ability to function, to participate fully in the workforce, and to live a productive life.

How Chronic Pain Impacts Productivity and the NYC Workforce

When the national statistics on lost productivity are applied to the unique, high-pressure work environment of New York City, the true scale of the crisis comes into sharp focus. For both employees and employers, the consequences are direct, tangible, and severe.

Lost Workdays: The High Cost of Absenteeism

Absenteeism—missing days of work—is the most straightforward measure of lost productivity. National data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) highlights the impact of pain-related conditions. In 2022, musculoskeletal injuries like sprains, strains, and tears accounted for 547,980 cases that involved days away from work (DAFW), while back injuries alone resulted in another 250,830 DAFW cases. For these incidents, the median time away from work was 10 days—two full workweeks.²³

For a business, this translates into significant direct costs. An analysis from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) found that a single workers’ compensation claim related to patient handling—a common source of back pain for healthcare workers—cost an average of $15,600. Of that amount, $12,000 was for wage replacement alone, covering the employee’s lost time.²⁴

Reduced On-the-Job Performance: The Hidden Drain of Presenteeism

While absenteeism is costly, it is dwarfed by the much larger, and often invisible, cost of presenteeism. This phenomenon occurs when an employee is physically at their job but, due to pain and its associated symptoms like fatigue and lack of focus, is unable to perform at their full capacity.²⁵⁻²⁷ Their output is lower, their work quality may suffer, and their engagement diminishes.

Research shows that this is where the real productivity drain happens. An estimated 77% of the total lost productive time due to pain comes from presenteeism, not absenteeism.²⁸ The numbers are striking: one study found that employees with back pain lost an average of 5.2 hours of productive time per week while at their jobs.²⁸

The Amplified Financial Risk for NYC Workers with Chronic Pain

The economic devastation of chronic pain is particularly acute for New Yorkers. A powerful, city-specific study of the World Trade Center Health Registry cohort provides a stark local example. The study found that individuals suffering from chronic pain had more than twice the odds of having a household income below $50,000 and more than three times the odds of taking early retirement.²⁹ This research provides a direct, causal link between pain and severe economic decline within our city.

This vulnerability is compounded by an inadequate local safety net. For years, New York State’s mandatory Short-Term Disability (STD) benefit was capped at just $170 per week—a sum that is wholly insufficient for survival in a city with some of the highest living costs in the world.³⁰ While the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) can provide job protection for up to 12 weeks, it is unpaid leave, offering little financial relief.³⁰˒³¹

When this weak safety net is set against the backdrop of NYC’s economic reality—where housing costs have surged by over 68% in a single decade—the danger becomes clear.¹˒² For a working New Yorker, a period of disability or reduced hours due to chronic pain is not a temporary setback; it is a direct and rapid path toward financial crisis. This amplified risk makes the need for effective, accessible, and affordable pain treatments not just a matter of health and comfort, but one of urgent economic survival for a huge segment of the city’s workforce.

Acupuncture and Dry Needling as Evidence-Based Pain Interventions

The immense human and economic costs of chronic pain, coupled with the ongoing opioid crisis, have created an urgent need for safer, non-addictive, and effective treatment options. New York City’s own Department of Health guidelines reflect this shift, encouraging clinicians to consider non-opioid and non-pharmacological therapies for pain management.³² Among the most promising of these interventions are two therapies that, despite using similar tools, are based on distinct medical principles: acupuncture and dry needling.

Understanding Acupuncture and Dry Needling Therapies

• Acupuncture: While rooted in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), acupuncture is understood from a modern, Western medical perspective as a form of neuromodulation.³³ The practice involves the insertion of very fine, sterile needles into specific points on the body. Scientific research suggests this stimulation prompts the central nervous system to release the body’s own natural pain-relieving chemicals, such as endorphins and serotonin, and helps modulate how pain signals are processed in the spinal cord and brain.³⁴⁻³⁶ This can interrupt the cycle of chronic pain signaling, reduce inflammation, and promote healing.³⁷
• Dry Needling: Dry needling is a technique grounded in modern Western medicine and anatomy. It specifically targets “myofascial trigger points”—more commonly known as muscle knots—which are tight, irritable spots in muscle tissue that can cause both local and referred pain.³⁸⁻⁴⁰ A practitioner inserts a “dry” needle (one that contains no medication) directly into the trigger point. The goal is often to elicit a “local twitch response,” an involuntary reflex that causes the knotted muscle fibers to contract and then relax. This process helps to release tension, increase blood flow to the oxygen-starved tissue, and break the pain cycle at its source.²⁹˒⁴¹˒⁴²

Key Differences in Approach and Application

For patients, the two therapies can look similar, but their underlying philosophies and applications are distinct.

• Acupuncture is based on the principles of TCM, which focus on balancing the body’s energy flow along pathways called meridians. It is used to treat a wide range of systemic conditions beyond just pain.³³ During a session, needles are often left in place for an extended period (e.g., 15-30 minutes) to achieve a therapeutic effect.⁴³
• Dry Needling is based on Western neuroanatomy and the scientific understanding of trigger points. Its focus is almost exclusively on treating musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. During a session, the practitioner may manipulate the needle to find and release the trigger point, and the needle may be removed much more quickly.³⁸˒⁴³

The key takeaway is that while both therapies use fine needles to alleviate pain, their diagnostic approach, treatment targets, and theoretical frameworks are different. However, both have been shown to be effective tools in the management of chronic pain, offering a path toward relief without the risks associated with long-term medication use.⁴⁴⁻⁴⁶

The Cost-Effectiveness of Acupuncture and Dry Needling

Beyond simply being effective, a crucial question for patients, employers, and insurers is whether these treatments are cost-effective. The evidence strongly suggests that investing in therapies like acupuncture and dry needling is not just a healthcare expenditure, but a sound economic strategy that can yield significant returns by tackling the root causes of lost productivity.

Economic Analysis: The Case for Acupuncture

Multiple large-scale studies have demonstrated the compelling cost-effectiveness of acupuncture. A major meta-analysis focusing on chronic low back pain—one of the most common and costly conditions—concluded that adding acupuncture to a patient’s standard care regimen is a “highly cost-effective” strategy.⁴⁷˒⁴⁸

These economic evaluations often use a metric called the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). In simple terms, a QALY is a measure of health that considers both the length of life and its quality; one QALY is equivalent to one year in perfect health. Interventions that can “buy” a QALY for a low cost are considered highly valuable. Studies have consistently shown that acupuncture provides significant gains in QALYs for a relatively modest cost.⁴⁹⁻⁵¹ In some cases, when factoring in the reduced need for other medical services, acupuncture has been shown to be cost-saving over a one-year period.²⁹˒⁵²

Economic Analysis: The Case for Dry Needling

Similarly, dry needling is recognized as a minimally invasive and low-cost treatment modality that can have a significant positive economic impact.⁵³˒⁵⁴ Research has shown that incorporating dry needling into a comprehensive physical therapy program can lead to better clinical outcomes while simultaneously lowering costs to society. By effectively treating pain and restoring function, dry needling helps reduce absenteeism and lessens the need for more invasive and expensive interventions.²⁹˒⁵⁵˒⁵⁶

One study introduced the concept of “cost per responder,” which measures how much it costs to achieve a favorable outcome in a patient. The analysis found that the cost per responder was significantly lower for the group receiving dry needling compared to control groups.⁵⁵ This indicates that dry needling is an efficient use of healthcare dollars, delivering tangible results for a smaller investment.

Overcoming Insurance Barriers to Cost-Effective Care

Despite this robust evidence, a significant barrier remains: insurance coverage. For many patients, cost is a primary obstacle to accessing care.⁵⁷ While evidence points to the long-term savings these therapies can provide, many insurance plans offer limited or no coverage for acupuncture and even less for dry needling, which is a newer practice.⁵⁵˒⁵⁸ This paradox forces patients and their employers to continue paying for the consequences of untreated or poorly managed pain—including higher direct medical bills and the much larger indirect costs of lost productivity—rather than investing in the very interventions proven to be a cost-effective solution. This gap in coverage perpetuates the cycle of pain, disability, and economic loss.

Conclusion: A Healthier Workforce is a More Productive NYC

The evidence is clear and compelling. Chronic pain is not a peripheral health issue but a central economic challenge for New York City. It is a widespread condition that afflicts a significant portion of the city’s workforce, imposing a multi-billion-dollar burden on our economy. The true cost of this epidemic is not measured in pharmacy receipts or hospital bills, but in the vast, hidden expense of lost productivity—the empty desks from absenteeism and the diminished output from presenteeism. In a city defined by its high cost of living and relentless pace, the financial consequences for a worker sidelined by pain are particularly devastating.

Yet, this is not a problem without a solution. Safe, effective, and non-addictive therapies are available. Acupuncture and dry needling are not unproven “alternative” treatments; they are evidence-based, cost-effective interventions that directly address the functional impairments at the heart of the productivity crisis. By restoring function, reducing pain, and improving quality of life, they help get New Yorkers back on their feet and back to work, generating a powerful return on investment that benefits individuals, employers, and the city’s economy as a whole.

The path forward requires a shift in perspective. We must see the treatment of chronic pain not as a cost to be contained, but as a strategic investment in the health and vitality of our city’s greatest asset: its people. By expanding access to and insurance coverage for these proven therapies, New York City can break the debilitating cycle of pain and economic hardship. A healthier workforce is a more productive workforce. And a more productive workforce is the foundation of a more prosperous, resilient, and thriving New York for all.

References

1. Office of the New York State Comptroller. Reports. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹
2. Office of the New York State Comptroller. Reports on New York City. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹
3. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States. In: Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Appendix C. ²
4. Yong RJ, Mullins PM, Bhattacharyya N. Prevalence of Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:389-395. ³
5. Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:1001–1006. ⁴
6. MedlinePlus. Chronic Pain. Updated June 19, 2025. ⁵
7. WebMD. What Is Chronic Pain? Accessed June 19, 2025. ⁶
8. Torta R, et al. Chronic Pain: A Matter of Words. SN Compr Clin Med. 2021. ⁷
9. Rastad, J, et al. The Association Between Pain and Economic and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in World Trade Center Health Registry Enrollees. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. ⁸
10. Mayo Clinic Health System. Pathways through persistent pain: Tips for managing chronic pain. Accessed June 19, 2025. ⁹
11. Mayo Clinic Staff. Chronic pain: Medication decisions. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁰
12. Behavioral Health News. NYSPA Report: Chronic Pain and Behavioral Health – Underlying Data and Regulatory Responses. 2023. ¹¹
13. Thern, J, et al. Chronic Pain. StatPearls. 2024. ¹²
14. Mayo Clinic. Chronic pain: Medication decisions. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁰
15. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Ergonomics: The Study of Work. 2000. ¹³
16. New York State Department of Health. Chronic Diseases and Conditions. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁴
17. The New York Academy of Medicine. Chronic Disease. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁵
18. Tompkins County Whole Health. Chronic Disease. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁶
19. New York State Department of Health. BRFSS Brief: Disability Status. 2023. ¹⁷
20. New York State Department of Health. Disability and Health in New York State. Accessed June 19, 2025. ¹⁸
21. O’Keeffe M, O’Sullivan K, O’Sullivan P. Dangers of the Dysfunctional Workplace: The Role of Workplace Psychosocial Factors on the Development and Maintenance of Chronic Pain. Pain. 2021. ¹⁷
22. ARC, et al. Productivity Outcomes of Chronic Pain Management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Interpretive Synthesis. Pain Reports. 2024. ¹⁹
23. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities. Accessed June 19, 2025. ²⁰
24. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Safe Patient Handling: A Business Case for Hospitals. Accessed June 19, 2025. ²¹
25. Burton WN, et al. The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2005. ²²
26. Schultz AB, Edington DW. Presenteeism: A Public Health Hazard. J Occup Environ Med. 2007. ²³
27. Hadler RA, et al. Presenteeism and Absenteeism Before and After Single-Level Lumbar Spine Surgery. Global Spine J. 2022. ²⁴
28. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2443-2454. ²⁵
29. Rastad J, et al. Chronic and Acute Pain and Adverse Economic Outcomes in a 9/11-Exposed Cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(11):1455. ²⁶
30. New York State Bar Association. LegalEase: Things to Consider if You Have a Serious or Chronic Illness. Accessed June 19, 2025. ²⁷
31. U.S. Department of Labor. Fact Sheet #28F: Reasons for Taking Leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act. 2023. ²⁸
32. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. NYC Emergency Department Discharge Recommendations for Prescription Opioid Analgesics. Accessed June 19, 2025. ²⁹
33. Neuroscientific Update on the Mechanisms of Action of Acupuncture in Chronic Pain. JMRR. ³⁰
34. Zhang Z, et al. Potential mechanisms of acupuncture for neuropathic pain based on somatosensory system. Front Neurosci. 2022. ³¹
35. Zhang Z, et al. Effects and mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia mediated by afferent nerves in acupoint microenvironments. Front Neurosci. 2023. ³²
36. Lin J, et al. Understandings of acupuncture application and mechanisms. Chin Med. 2022. ³³
37. Shaftesbury Clinic. Mechanisms of action – Acupuncture and neurotransmitters in the body. 2022. ³⁴
38. Physiopedia. Dry Needling. Accessed June 19, 2025. ³⁵
39. MPOWER Physical Therapy. What Is Dry Needling: The Science Behind the Technique. Accessed June 19, 2025. ³⁶
40. Brooks Rehabilitation. What is Dry Needling & How Does It Work With Physical Therapy? Accessed June 19, 2025. ³⁷
41. Pomona Valley Health Centers. How Dry Needling Therapy Can Help Chronic Pain. Accessed June 19, 2025. ³⁸
42. MS Physical Therapy. How Dry Needling Therapy Can Help Chronic Pain. Accessed June 19, 2025. ³⁹
43. Cleveland Clinic. Difference Between Dry Needling and Acupuncture. 2024. ⁴⁰
44. Medical News Today. Dry needling vs. acupuncture: Benefits and uses. 2024. ⁴¹
45. Banner Health. Dry Needling vs. Acupuncture: What’s the Difference? 2023. ⁴²
46. One Accord Physical Therapy. The Difference Between Dry Needling and Acupuncture. Accessed June 19, 2025. ⁴³
47. Ambrósio, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Pain Physician. 2013. ⁴⁴
48. Ambrósio EM, Bloor K, MacPherson H. Cost-effectiveness of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16(6):E731-45. ⁴⁴
49. Witt CM, et al. Pragmatic randomized trial evaluating the clinical and economic effectiveness of acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Am J Epidemiol. 2006. ⁴⁵
50. Whitehurst DG, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Acupuncture Care as an Adjunct to Exercise-Based Physical Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Phys Ther. 2011. ⁴⁶
51. BMJ-British Medical Journal. Acupuncture Relieves Low Back Pain And Is Cost-effective, Study Finds. ScienceDaily. 2006. ⁴⁷
52. van den Heuvel E, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of acupuncture compared with usual care for acute non-specific low back pain: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2021. ⁴⁸
53. Sánchez-Infante J, et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Dry Needling in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain—An Umbrella Review. J Clin Med. 2023. ⁴⁹
54. Barrenechea-Soto M, et al. Treating myofascial pain with dry needling: a systematic review for the best evidence-based practices in low back pain. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2023. ⁵⁰
55. Myopain Seminars. Evaluating the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Dry Needling. Accessed June 19, 2025. ⁵¹
56. Arias-Buría JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of the Inclusion of Dry Needling into an Exercise Program for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2018. ⁵²
57. U.S. Pain Foundation. A Chronic Pain Crisis: 2022 Survey Results. 2022. ⁵³
58. Journal of Ethics | American Medical Association. Addressing Obstacles to Evidence-Informed Pain Care. 2020. ⁵⁴